On a recent “interview,” Chris Rosebrough, the self-styled pirate captain of discernment ministry, stepped into the ring with Corey Mahler, a figurehead of the Ethno Christian Nationalist (XNat) movement (which for the purpose of this article I’m differentiating from more mainstream and regular Christian Nationalism if “mainstream” can be used to describe the movement at all). What followed was not just a debate but a demolition. Rosebrough, armed with 15 years of sermon-skewering bravado, floundered. Mahler, underestimated and oft-dismissed, emerged not just intact but emboldened. This wasn’t a fluke. It was a symptom of a deeper rot within the Establishment Evangelical camp—a failure of theology, a triumph of arrogance, and a wake-up call they’re too smug to hear.
For years, Rosebrough has built a brand on tearing apart the soft underbelly of charismatic excess and seeker-sensitive fluff. His Fighting for the Faith platform, with its 87,000-plus YouTube subscribers, has been a bullhorn for Confessional Lutheranism, a place where he’s played theological sharpshooter against stationary targets—preachers who don’t fire back. But Mahler isn’t a prosperity gospel huckster or a NAR apostle-wannabe. He’s a different beast: a man who brings Scripture, church history, and reason to the table, however unpalatable his conclusions might be. Rosebrough, it turns out, wasn’t ready for a live opponent. He performed like a Range Bro who’s only ever shot at paper silhouettes, not a seasoned fighter facing return fire.
The fallout is clear: Mahler’s position is stronger than ever. Not because his ideas are universally compelling—many, including me, reject his more extreme racial leanings—but because he’s doing what his opponents aren’t; making arguments rooted in the Bible (whether or not I agree with the exgesis). Meanwhile, the anti-Ethno XNat brigade, led by figures like Rosebrough and the broader Establishment Evangelical machine, has leaned on a lazy playbook: call the XNats bad people, wave the racist/neo-Nazi flag, and assume the moral high ground is enough. It’s not. The Ethno XNats are winning, not because they’re saints, but because they’re doing their homework while their critics coast on gravitas and credentials.
This is a rebuke to the theological gatekeepers—Rosebrough chief among them—who’ve grown fat on their own credibility, assuming it’s a substitute for rigor. The Ethno Christian Nationalists are surging because they’re fighting on the battlefield of doctrine, and the Establishment is too arrogant to show up prepared. Let’s unpack this disaster, piece by piece, and see why the old guard is crumbling.
THE NON-DEBATE DEBATE
Details of the debate are murky—specific quotes and timestamps are hard to pin down without a transcript—but the sentiment across platforms like X tells the story. Observers, even those opposed to Mahler’s ideology, describe it as a rout. Rosebrough, with his trademark confidence, walked in expecting to dismantle Mahler’s Ethno Christian Nationalism with the same ease he’s used to debunk Bethel prophecies. Instead, he got outmaneuvered. Mahler, armed with a coherent framework—Scripture citations, appeals to early church fathers, and a vision of nationhood tied to biblical principles—left Rosebrough grasping.
What went wrong? For one, Rosebrough underestimated his opponent. Mahler isn’t a lightweight. He’s not just some Twitter troll with 3,000 followers spouting hot takes. He’s a thinker who’s wrestled with the text, however skewed his conclusions might be. Most suggest Mahler “destroyed” Rosebrough by sticking to a disciplined argument, while Rosebrough flailed, relying on rhetorical flair over substance. It’s not hard to imagine: Rosebrough, used to monologue-style sermon critiques, wasn’t ready for a two-way fight. His arsenal—built for dissecting unprepared pastors—lacked the precision to counter a prepared debater.
This wasn’t just a tactical misstep; it was hubris. Fifteen years of picking apart low-hanging fruit had convinced Rosebrough he could waltz into any arena and win. He’s a man who’s spent a career shooting at targets that don’t shoot back—prosperity preachers, NAR mystics, megachurch clowns. Mahler, whatever you think of him, brought a gun to the fight. Rosebrough brought a swagger and a slingshot.
UNDERESTIMATION OF COREY MAHLER
Let’s talk about Mahler for a moment. He’s not a household name, and that’s part of the problem. With a modest Twitter following and a co-hosting gig on the Stone Choir podcast, he’s been dismissed as fringe—a “two-bit theologian” to some. His views are incendiary: he’s argued the Curse of Ham applies racially, opposed interracial marriage, and questioned the abolition of slavery. These positions are odious to many, including Christians who see them as antithetical to the gospel’s message. But here’s the kicker: Mahler doesn’t just rant. He argues. He cites Scripture—Genesis, Deuteronomy, Romans—and ties it to a historical narrative of Christian nationhood. Agree or not, it’s a case you have to engage, not just denounce.
The Establishment has consistently underestimated him. They’ve painted him as a caricature—a racist bogeyman—rather than a doctrinal opponent. This is a strategic blunder. By focusing on his character (he’s a bad guy!) instead of his theology (he’s wrong about God!), they’ve ceded the intellectual ground. Mahler’s not winning hearts with charm; he’s winning debates with preparation. Rosebrough walked into that trap, assuming Mahler’s fringe status meant he’d collapse under scrutiny. Instead, Mahler turned the tables, exposing Rosebrough’s lack of depth in real-time combat.
This underestimation isn’t unique to Rosebrough. It’s systemic. The XNats—Mahler, his Stone Choir co-host Treble Woe, and their ilk—have been dismissed as irrelevant by a theological elite too comfortable in their echo chambers. But relevance isn’t about follower counts; it’s about resonance. And the XNats are resonating because they’re speaking to a hunger for biblical clarity in a chaotic age, while their critics offer platitudes and finger-wagging.
ANTI-XNAT PLAYBOOK: ALL VIBES, NO ARGUMENTS
Here’s where the Establishment Evangelicals have truly failed. Their response to Christian Nationalism has been a masterclass in missing the point. Scan the critiques—from Rosebrough’s Fighting for the Faith to broader evangelical outlets like The Gospel Coalition or Christianity Today—and you’ll see a pattern: it’s all about why XNats are bad people. They’re racist. They’re nationalists (gasp!). They’re a threat to democracy. They’re theologically “dangerous” because… well, because they’re mean.
Where’s the exegesis? Where’s the counterargument from Scripture? It’s AWOL. The anti-XNat case rarely engages the biblical claims head-on. Mahler says nations are defined by blood and soil, rooted in Genesis 10’s table of nations? Crickets. He ties covenant theology to ethnic identity? Silence. He argues the church has a duty to shape culture through governance? You’ll get a lecture on the First Amendment, not a rebuttal from Matthew 28 or Romans 13.
This isn’t just laziness; it’s cowardice. The Establishment doesn’t want to wrestle with the XNats’ texts because it’s hard. It’s easier to sling adjectives—racist, extremist, un-Christian—than to crack open a Bible and refute them verse by verse. Rosebrough’s debate performance epitomized this: he leaned on moral outrage and rhetorical jabs, not a systematic dismantling of Mahler’s framework. The result? Mahler looked like the guy with the stronger case, because he was the only one making one.
Contrast this with the XNats. Agree or disagree, they’re doing the work. They’re citing Scripture, however selectively. They’re appealing to tradition, however controversially. They’re offering a vision—flawed, divisive, but coherent. The Establishment’s counter? “That’s not nice.” It’s a losing strategy, and Rosebrough’s flop proved it.
ARROGANCE: THE ACHILLES HEEL OF THE GATEKEEPERS
Rosebrough’s collapse wasn’t just about Mahler’s skill; it was about Rosebrough’s arrogance. For over a decade, he’s built a persona as the pirate who rights the theological ship—sinking heretics with wit and a Lutheran lens. It’s worked against the likes of Kenneth Copeland or Steven Furtick, whose errors are so glaring they’re low-hanging fruit. But that success bred complacency. Rosebrough assumed his track record—his “credibility”—would carry him against Mahler. It didn’t.
This is the Range Bro analogy in full color. Rosebrough’s spent years at the theological shooting range, blasting away at targets that don’t move, don’t duck, don’t return fire. He’s honed a style: sarcastic, confident, performative. It’s great for YouTube clicks, less so for a live debate. Mahler didn’t just stand there and take it. He fired back—with arguments, not zingers—and Rosebrough had no answer. The pirate captain, so used to ruling the waves, capsized when the sea fought back.
This arrogance isn’t Rosebrough’s alone; it’s the Establishment’s. The gatekeepers—pastors, seminary profs, discernment bloggers—have coasted on their laurels, assuming their degrees, platforms, and moral superiority are enough. They’ve forgotten that theology is a fight, not a coronation. The XNats, for all their flaws, get this. They’re scrappy, hungry, and willing to slug it out in the trenches. The Establishment, meanwhile, is sipping coffee in the ivory tower, wondering why the peasants won’t just listen.
WHY THE ETHNO-CHRISTIAN NATIONALISTS ARE WINNING
Let’s be clear: the Ethno Christian Nationalists aren’t winning because they’re right. Their fusion of ethno nationalism with Christianity raises red flags—biblically, historically, ethically. Galatians 3:28 (“neither Jew nor Greek”) and Revelation 7:9 (a multitude from every nation) shred any notion of racial primacy in God’s kingdom. Their selective reading of Scripture—ignoring the exile ethic of Jeremiah 29 or the universal mission of Acts—undercuts their case. They’re not invincible.
But they’re winning because they’re fighting. They’re making arguments—specific, textual, provocative—while their opponents clutch pearls. Mahler’s debate victory wasn’t about charm or mass appeal; it was about showing up with a game plan. The XNats are tapping into a zeitgeist: a desire for clarity, identity, and purpose in a world of cultural drift. They’re offering answers, rooted in a (twisted) biblical narrative, while the Establishment offers hand-wringing and hashtags.
The Establishment’s failure isn’t just tactical; it’s spiritual. They’ve traded the sword of the Spirit for the shield of respectability. They’re more worried about PR than proclamation. The XNats, for better or worse, aren’t. They’re unapologetic, and that rawness resonates when the alternative is milquetoast moralizing.
This is a gut punch to the gatekeepers. Rosebrough’s flop isn’t just his embarrassment; it’s a mirror for every pastor, professor, and pundit who thinks gravitas trumps grit. You can’t defeat an opponent you won’t engage. You can’t win a war of ideas with vibes and virtue signaling. The XNats are at the gates—not because they’re morally superior, but because they’re theologically relentless. The Establishment, smug in its towers, is losing ground it doesn’t even realize it’s ceded.
What’s the fix? Do the work. Crack the books. Open the Bible.
Rosebrough’s debate disaster is a warning: credibility isn’t enough. The gatekeepers have to fight—not just with indignation, but with intelligence. The XNats are winning because they’re prepared. The Establishment isn’t. Until that changes, the pirate ship sinks, and the nationalists sail on.
THE ROAD AHEAD
This isn’t a defense of Mahler or the XNats. Their errors are legion—racism dressed in biblical garb is still racism. But it’s a call to arms for those who oppose them. Stop underestimating. Stop moralizing. Start arguing. The debate wasn’t just Rosebrough’s loss; it was a symptom of a broader collapse. The theological elite have rested on their laurels too long, and the ground is shifting beneath them.
Mahler’s stronger now, not because he’s unassailable, but because his foes are asleep. Wake up, gatekeepers. The Ethno XNats are at the door, and they brought their Bibles. Time to bring yours—and use it.
If you appreciate my work, consider grabbing a paid subscription for $8 a month or $80 a year to access exclusive content (about half of our articles are paid-only).
If you don’t do subscriptions, consider a one-time gift of your choosing by clicking the link below. This is one of the things I do to provide for my small farm and big family, so I sure appreciate it.
Share this post