Biblical Supernaturalism (And the Dangers of Hyper-Cessationism)

God has called us to be Supernaturalists. The moment we aren't, our cessationism has gone too far.

Cessationism is the view that certain spiritual gifts, specifically the miraculous or “sign” gifts—such as tongues, prophecy, and healing—were temporary in nature and ceased with the close of the Apostolic Age. This view does not deny the power of God or His sovereignty to act in miraculous ways. It does not reduce Christianity to a rationalistic deism devoid of supernatural power. Rather, it insists that God operates according to the structure and rhythm He has revealed in Scripture: a pattern where miracles are clustered around critical epochs of redemptive history, not sprinkled evenly across all generations.

This doctrine, often maligned or misunderstood, finds its strength not in philosophical presuppositions but in the very logic and pattern of Scripture itself. Cessationism is not based on a weak-kneed skepticism or a dry rationalism—it is rooted in the authority, sufficiency, and finality of the Word of God.

THE PATTERN OF MIRACULOUS EPOCHS

When you survey the Bible, it quickly becomes apparent that miracles are not evenly distributed throughout the narrative. In fact, the vast majority of biblical history is devoid of public, earth-shaking miracles. Instead, miraculous acts tend to cluster in a few concentrated periods, each one corresponding with a new revelatory movement of God in redemptive history. These epochs include: the time of Moses and the giving of the Law, the era of Elijah and Elisha during the prophetic crisis in Israel, and the New Testament period ushered in by Jesus and the Apostles. Each of these periods involved the introduction of new revelation from God, and each was accompanied by signs and wonders intended to confirm that revelation and establish divine authority.

This pattern is not incidental. Hebrews 2:3–4 makes this explicit when it says the message of salvation "was declared at first by the Lord, and it was attested to us by those who heard, while God also bore witness by signs and wonders and various miracles and by gifts of the Holy Spirit distributed according to his will." The signs were not random displays of supernatural power—they were God’s own witness to the authority of those proclaiming His message. Once the message was delivered and the canon of Scripture complete, the need for such miraculous confirmation passed.

THE SIGNS OF A TRUE APOSTLE

This leads us to the core biblical text often cited by cessationists: 2 Corinthians 12:12. Paul writes, “The signs of a true apostle were performed among you with utmost patience, with signs and wonders and mighty works.” This is not a generic commendation of miracles. Paul is staking apostolic authenticity on these signs. The implication is clear: these signs—miracles, wonders, mighty deeds—were not merely random acts of divine charity. They were apostolic credentials.

Importantly, cessationists do not argue that only the Apostles themselves performed such miracles. The term “Apostolic Sign Gifts” can be a little misleading. The gifts were not limited to the Apostles alone, but they were tethered to the Apostolic authority. Those upon whom the Apostles laid their hands often received the ability to prophesy, speak in tongues, or perform healings. This can be seen in the book of Acts, where Philip, though not an Apostle, performs miracles (Acts 8:6), but it is only when Peter and John come down to Samaria that the Holy Spirit is given to believers through the laying on of hands (Acts 8:14–17). It is this Apostolic conduit that Simon the Sorcerer attempted to buy (Acts 8:18–19), and the text makes it plain that he desired not the miracles themselves, but the ability to confer the Spirit as the Apostles did—effectively seeking to purchase Apostleship.

THE ROLE OF PROPHECY IN AN UNFINISHED CANON

The miraculous gift of prophecy served an indispensable role in the early church—not as an alternative to Scripture, but as a placeholder until Scripture was complete. Before the New Testament canon was finalized, Christians did not have the luxury of turning to Galatians or 1 Peter for apostolic teaching. They needed direct guidance, and God in His providence provided it through New Testament prophets. These prophets were, in essence, deliverymen for God's interim instructions to the church. But once the full revelation of Christ had been recorded and preserved in Scripture, the need for ongoing prophecy evaporated.

Paul addresses this transitional phase in 1 Corinthians 13:8–10, saying, “Love never ends. But as for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will vanish away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part, but when the perfect comes, the partial will pass away.” The phrase “when the perfect comes” (Greek: to teleion) has been the subject of debate, but within the cessationist framework, it is understood to refer to the completion of the New Testament canon—the full and final revelation of God’s will for the church. Once the “perfect” had come, the “partial” forms of revelation, including prophecy and tongues, passed away.'

THE END OF APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION

Closely tied to this argument is the understanding that the Apostolic office itself was not intended to be perpetuated. The Apostles were a unique class of men—eyewitnesses to the resurrection, personally commissioned by Christ, and vested with foundational authority for the church. Paul declares in Ephesians 2:20 that the church is “built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone.” Once a foundation is laid, you don’t keep laying it. That office died out with the death of John, the last living Apostle.

This matters because the sign gifts were inextricably bound to Apostolic authority. To claim the continuation of such gifts today is implicitly to claim some form of continued Apostolic succession—a notion soundly refuted both by Scripture and by church history. The very reason Simon Magus’ request was so outrageous in Acts 8 was that Apostolic authority was not transferable by purchase, nor was it renewable by mere desire.

THE SUFFICIENCY OF SCRIPTURE

At the heart of cessationism is the conviction that the Bible is sufficient. If the Word of God is complete, authoritative, and fully equipped to train the man of God in every good work (2 Timothy 3:16–17), then the demand for further prophecy is not just unnecessary—it is a practical denial of the sufficiency of Scripture. One cannot say “Scripture is enough” and then live as though more direct revelation is needed for direction, instruction, or encouragement.

The charismatic insistence on modern-day prophecy often functionally sidelines the Bible. It relegates the written Word to a secondary source while elevating personal impressions, vague utterances, and unverifiable revelations. This not only introduces confusion but often leads to theological error. When every believer becomes a mouthpiece for God, and every private impulse is baptized as divine revelation, the guardrails come off. The result is a church governed not by the Word but by personal subjectivism—a chaos masquerading as spirituality.

THE DANGERS OF CHARISMATIC EXCESS

History bears this out. Every major cult and heretical movement—from Montanism to Mormonism—has found its genesis in someone claiming new revelation from God. The modern charismatic movement, with its emphasis on prophecy, tongues, and personal revelation, often resembles these patterns. Though not all charismatics descend into heresy, the soil is fertile for error when divine authority is detached from the written Word.

Moreover, the endless pursuit of “fresh fire” and new spiritual highs creates a restless, emotionally driven Christianity that lacks doctrinal depth. When the ordinary means of grace—prayer, preaching, and the sacraments—are deemed insufficient, the church begins to chase spectacle over substance, entertainment over edification.

BUT WHAT ABOUT MIRACLES TODAY?

Cessationism does not teach that God has stopped performing miracles. It simply insists that the gift of performing miracles is no longer given to individuals in the church. God is free to heal, intervene, or deliver as He pleases. He answers prayer. He providentially acts. But He does not continue to dispense miracle-working power to men as He did in the Apostolic age. There is a difference between saying “God heals” and saying “I have the gift of healing.”

The burden of proof lies with the continuationist who claims the gift still operates today. In the New Testament, healings were immediate, public, and total. The blind saw. The lame walked. The dead were raised. Today’s so-called healings are often vague, unverifiable, and easily explained by emotion, psychology, or natural processes. No one is restoring amputated limbs or raising the dead in emergency rooms. The standard of biblical miracles simply isn’t being met.

CONCLUSION: A FAITH THAT STANDS ON SCRIPTURE

Cessationism is not a cold, clinical rejection of God’s power. It is a faithful submission to the pattern and authority of God’s Word. It recognizes that God’s extraordinary works had extraordinary purposes—and those purposes have been fulfilled. The Scriptures are now complete. The foundation has been laid. The apostles have spoken. The Word has been confirmed by signs and wonders.

We now live in the age of the church, where faith comes not by dreams or visions, but by hearing—and hearing through the Word of Christ (Romans 10:17). That Word is sufficient, inerrant, and powerful. It does not need to be supplemented by modern-day prophets or ecstatic utterances. It needs only to be believed, preached, and obeyed.

To insist otherwise is not to honor the Spirit—but to grieve Him. For the Spirit who once inspired prophecy now illuminates Scripture. The Spirit who once gave tongues now grants understanding. And the Spirit who once healed through the hands of men now works through the means of grace—sanctifying, convicting, regenerating, and preserving the saints of God until the end.

That is not a downgrade. That is maturity. And that is the heart of biblical cessationism.

WHEN CESSATIONISM GOES TOO FAR

Cessationism, rightly understood, is a biblical and historical doctrine grounded in the authority, sufficiency, and finality of Scripture. But like all good doctrines, it has its heretical shadows. Hyper-cessationism is not a term invented by charismatics to smear their opponents. It is a real and observable theological distortion—one that takes the biblical arguments for the cessation of sign gifts and stretches them into a denial of anything remotely supernatural in the life of the church today. Where biblical cessationism honors the Spirit’s work in illuminating Scripture, convicting sinners, guiding providence, and regenerating the heart, hyper-cessationism collapses everything spiritual into a mere academic echo of the past.

In short, hyper-cessationism is not just a denial of new revelation—it becomes a denial of any personal divine activity at all. The Holy Spirit is shelved, prayer is neutered, providence is ignored, and the Christian life is flattened into a sterile routine of intellectual agreement with the Bible. What begins as a defense of the Word ends as a functional deism.

FROM GUARDRAIL TO DEAD END

The basic argument for cessationism is simple and sound. God revealed Himself through signs and wonders in specific epochs of redemptive history, usually clustered around the giving of new revelation—such as the Law through Moses, the prophetic era of Elijah and Elisha, and the Apostolic era of the New Testament. Each time, these miracles authenticated the messengers and confirmed the divine origin of their words. Once the canon of Scripture was complete—when the “perfect” (teleios) had come (1 Corinthians 13:10)—the need for such authenticating signs ceased. The Apostolic sign gifts, including tongues, prophecy, and miraculous healing, were no longer necessary because the final Word had been delivered, preserved, and sealed.

But hyper-cessationists do not stop at the cessation of tongues and prophecy. They begin to treat all subjective Christian experience as suspect. They no longer expect God to answer prayer in real time. They cringe at talk of providence or divine leading. They become allergic to any reference to the Holy Spirit’s present ministry that isn’t purely academic. Eventually, they begin to act as though the Trinity is really just a Binity—Father and Son, with the Spirit as a kind of theological placeholder with no living function.

They’ll claim this is in the interest of guarding orthodoxy. But what they are really guarding is a rationalistic reduction of the faith that would be more at home in a seminary lecture than in the pages of Acts.

SMITE CLUB ARTICLES ARE AVAILABLE ONLY TO PAID SUBSCRIBERS OF INSIGHT TO INCITE.

THE SPIRIT THAT NO LONGER MOVES

The early Reformers were cessationists, but they were not hyper-cessationists. John Calvin wrote extensively about the Spirit’s illuminating power and His role in guiding the church through history. Martin Luther’s entire Reformation theology hinged on the Spirit’s active work in convicting sinners and empowering bold proclamation. The Puritans, often unfairly caricatured as cerebral, were rich in language about divine providence, spiritual comfort, and the internal witness of the Spirit. They prayed as if they believed God would move. They preached as if they expected hearts to be pierced. They wept over souls. They rejoiced in answered prayer. They believed God not only had spoken, but still speaks through His Word—powerfully, personally, and presently.

Hyper-cessationists, by contrast, speak of the Spirit in the past tense. The idea that God might still intervene in individual lives or lead His people in some non-revelatory way is dismissed as mysticism. Those who speak of conviction, spiritual discernment, or providential guidance are accused of charismatic drift. Any subjective language of God’s dealings with the soul is replaced with cold abstractions and textbook theology. The Spirit becomes a theory, not a Person. His work becomes a footnote, not a reality. Prayer becomes a formality. Worship becomes lecture. Christianity becomes mechanical.

This is not biblical cessationism. It is spiritual desiccation.

THE DEATH OF PROVIDENCE

One of the most disturbing features of hyper-cessationism is its disdain for providence. In Scripture, providence is not some soft, sentimental doctrine—it’s the nuts and bolts of how God governs the world. From the roll of the dice (Proverbs 16:33) to the appointment of kings (Daniel 2:21), to the feeding of sparrows and the number of hairs on a man’s head (Matthew 10:29–30), providence is the personal hand of God in the affairs of men. Christians throughout history have seen God’s providence in the closing of doors, the answering of prayers, the sustaining of the saints in suffering, and even the timely arrival of people and resources. Providence is not revelation—it is divine choreography. And it’s real.

Hyper-cessationists are often so afraid of sounding charismatic that they refuse to see God's hand in anything but the printed page of Scripture. They’ll object to the idea that God “leads” people to take a certain job or “burdens” them to pray for a friend. They roll their eyes when someone says they felt conviction during a sermon or sensed God answering a prayer. They’ve replaced God's sovereign omnipresence with a sealed canon and called it piety. But what they’ve actually done is create a God who is mute, immobile, and uninterested in His own creation.

This is not caution. It’s unbelief.

PRAYER WITHOUT EXPECTATION

A sure sign you’re dealing with hyper-cessationism is when prayer has become an exercise in theological duty rather than communion with a living God. In theory, hyper-cessationists will say they believe God hears and answers prayer. But in practice, they treat prayer like a kind of internal journaling exercise. They don't expect the lost to be converted, the sick to be healed, the fearful to be comforted, or the anxious to be calmed. They say God “can” answer prayer but behave as if He won’t. If someone gives testimony to answered prayer, they look for psychological explanations or “natural” causes. There’s no place in their system for real-time divine involvement.

Ironically, this is far more dangerous than the errors of the charismatics they oppose. At least charismatics still believe God is active. At least they still pray with urgency. Hyper-cessationism has all the theological categories in place but no living fire. It has orthodoxy without expectancy, doctrine without doxology, Scripture without Spirit. It is the form of godliness that denies its power.

THE HYPER-CESSATIONIST GOD: UNINVOLVED AND INACCESSIBLE

Hyper-cessationism does not exalt the sovereignty of God—it empties it of all vitality. In their system, God becomes like a retired king who once ruled with authority but now sits silently on the throne, content to let history run its course while His people argue over grammar and Greek tenses. They have so overcorrected for the errors of Pentecostalism and the charismatic movement that they’ve exorcised any living sense of divine immanence from the Christian life.

They affirm the Trinity, but relate to God like deists. The Father is distant. The Son is an abstraction. The Spirit is essentially unemployed. The faith becomes a rational assent to past events and closed books, but not a living, breathing communion with God Himself.

This is a far cry from the experiential piety of the New Testament, where the Spirit convicts, guides, comforts, and empowers. Jesus promised His disciples that the Spirit would dwell in them, lead them into truth, and bring to remembrance all He had said. Paul says the Spirit bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God. These are not metaphors—they are descriptions of real spiritual experience. They are not new revelation—but they are real relationship.

If you appreciate my work, consider an $8 a month or $80 a year paid subscription to access exclusive content (like the rest of this article).

If you don’t do subscriptions, consider a one-time gift of your choosing by clicking the ‘coffee link’ below. This is one of the things I do to provide for my small farm and big family, so I sure appreciate it.