The Great Replacement is a Conspiracy, But Not a Theory

There is definite evidence that the replacement of certain people-groups is a scheme, and historically, has been a successful one. And further, it's been a scheme of certain religions. This is Part I.

The term ‘Conspiracy Theory’ was invented in 1863 to dismiss claims that the British Empire was trying to intentionally weaken the United States during the War of Northern Aggression to further their financial interests. Charles Astor Bristed was the author who coined the term in a letter to the New York Times.

CONSPIRACY THEORY

I’ve provided a screenshot of that letter published January 11 of that year, first using the term. Bristed pointed out that the British were playing both sides of the war between America’s two nations. At some points appearing deeply committed to abolition and cheering the election of Lincoln, and indeed the declaration of war that followed, the British also sent privateers to do business with the South and seemed to undermine their anti-slavery positions at several turns. But interestingly, Bristed wasn’t attacking a theory; he was promoting one.

The so-called “fact-checkers” use this obscure historic tidbit to claim the suggestion that the CIA invented the term “conspiracy theory” to be false and off by one hundred years. It’s a juke-and-jive of fact, however. Although the term had existed since January 11, 1863 (and was used to allege conspiracy was indeed a real and plausible thing), it was indeed the CIA that applied to the term its negative connotations.

As Lance De-Haven Smith chronicles in his 2013 book, The Warren Report, the term began to be leaked to news outlets by official government sources within the intelligence apparatus to dismiss allegations that Lee Harvey Oswald had worked for the CIA (a claim that turned out to be true). The fact-checkers have also claimed this false, because - they tell us - the CIA only used the term “conspiracy theories” (in the plural, and not the singular), so it doesn’t count.

The term has since been used with universally negative connotations, a dismissive way to suggest that someone has embraced an idea more easily proven by observable facts or those who reject “the received accounts” (as Douglas Wilson says). The term “tin-foil hat” was applied to conspiracy theorists, referring to a short story by the brother of Brave New World’s author, Aldous Huxley, in which a character wore a metal hat to avoid an evil scientist’s mind-control scheme.

WEIRD HISTORIC CAVEAT: Peripheral to the point of this post, let me throw in the following for free. Huxley’s brother, Julian, wrote the ‘tin-foil hat’ short story (entitled the Tissue-Culture King) about a scientist’s efforts at mind control, in 1929. In it, the evil scientist antagonist was using radio waves to effect someone’s brain. In 2005, MIT graduate students released a study showing that a metal hat no thicker than tin-foil can indeed affect reception of radio waves on the wearer’s natural biological receivers…but only at the frequencies owned and operated exclusively by the U.S. government. If you’re familiar with Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, you know that he appeared to have spooky insight into the future, as his book is often considered a more-accurate depiction of current times than Orwell’s 1984. I’ve often joked, wondering where the smell-o-vision technology is, because everything but that in Brave, New World has come to pass in my lifetime. I was wondering how the Huxley brothers seemed to have a special tap into the future by about one-hundred years and discovered that Huxley was a sub-Christian mystic who developed a system called The Perennial Philosophy to peer into the future through a form of transcendental meditation. I might write about this at a later point.

Since the CIA’s commandeering of this term, it has been applied to the Tuskegee Experiment, MKA Ultra, various CIA assassinations, Operation Mockingbird, Operation Paperclip, Operation Northwoods, and the Bohemian Grove (all of which turned out to be true).

If you appreciate my work and don’t want to deal with a subscription, consider a one-time gift of your choosing to show your support. This is one of the things I do to support my small farm and family, so I sure appreciate it.

GREAT REPLACEMENT

When nationalists reference being replaced by runaway migration, without fail, someone comes along and accuses them of propagating a tired-old conspiracy theory called The Great Replacement.

Likely, those looking around and noticing that non-nationals are taking their jobs, crowding them out of housing, or raising the crime rate so much that those with means leave their communities, have never read or even heard of the 2011 book by French thinker, Renauld Camus. It might very well be the first book accused of being a “rightwing, antisemitic, and racist” book written by a fabulously liberal gay man.

In the book, which I read not that long ago, Camus simply gives demographic and statistical data, along with outlining changes over the last century, to demonstrate that indeed the population of Europe is being replaced by those who are not European. Camus also suggests that at least to some extent, migration policy demonstrates that this is the purpose and plan. And that’s hard for anyone to contest, because Camus indeed provides quotations from those who set the policy, in which they explicitly state that replacing Europeans with non-Europeans is the plan. Of course, replacement - by those who promote it - is shrouded in terms of diversity and other utopian notions that tell us a very bad thing, is a very good, virtuous thing. Writing from the perspective of a Frenchman who is losing France altogether, Camus disagreed.

In my many years, I don’t know that I’ve ever seen something so evident by the facts displayed on the nightly news, be so dismissed as a “conspiracy theory” as the central claims of Renauld Camus.

Paris no longer looks like Paris. London no longer looks like London. Muhammad has overtaken Noah as the #1 baby name in both the United Kingdom and Germany. Muhammad has overtaken Gabriel as the #1 baby name in France. When Elon Musk pointed this out on X, Newsweek fact-checked the claim as false, only because it didn’t combine the variant spellings of Muhammad together.

The rouse of Europeans not being replaced on the part of fact-checkers and Wikipedia editors can only go so far, because it has become so obvious that people can notice it just by looking around.

But the question I am posing here is two-fold; first (1) does the Bible speak of Great Replacement, or is it referenced in Biblical prophecy? And secondly (2), who is driving Great Replacement, and are particular religions more guilty than others?

If you appreciate my work, please considering getting a paid subscription to access exclusive content. This is one of the things I do to provide for my family, so I’d sure appreciate it.