Taboo But True: How Jewish Groups Are Facilitating Mass Muslim Migration

You're not supposed to notice, but sometimes you just can't help it.

The city that gave the world Wall Street, Broadway, and bagels is now flirting with something that, not long ago, would have seemed unthinkable: a Muslim mayor. In New York. The same New York that practically doubles as an overseas consulate for Tel Aviv, the same New York where nearly every media outlet, hedge fund, Ivy League university, and political consultancy is marinated in Jewish institutional power. The same New York where AIPAC throws fundraisers more lavish than royal weddings and rabbis get police escorts to their Shabbat dinners. And now, a Muslim mayor?

To the casual observer, this development might seem like proof that the idea of Jewish influence is a tinfoil-hat fever dream. After all, how could Jews be running the show if a practicing Muslim—representing a demographic historically in tension with Jews—is on track to run the most Jewish city outside of Israel? But that surface-level reaction misses the plot. It misunderstands the entire game. Because the rise of Muslim political power in the West, far from undermining the theory of disproportionate Jewish influence, actually confirms it—if you know where to look.

THE ARAB MIGRATION WAVE

The first domino fell in 1948, when the Israeli state was born in a cauldron of blood and borders. Around 750,000 Palestinian Arabs were driven from or fled their homes, in what their descendants call the Nakba—the catastrophe. Meanwhile, roughly 800,000 Jews were expelled from Arab countries like Iraq, Syria, Egypt, and Yemen, with most absorbed by the newly minted Israel. It was a cultural population swap on a continental scale, but with aftershocks that never stopped.

Because as those Jews arrived in Israel and settled into jobs, houses, and positions once occupied by Arabs, yet more tension ignited. And over the decades, the Middle East became a permanent tinderbox—wars, intifadas, sanctions, regime changes, drone strikes, foreign occupations, and a thousand lesser-known tribal or regional skirmishes. From these crucibles emerged what can only be described as a civilization-wide Arab exodus.

By conservative estimates, between 20 and 30 million Arab refugees have been created in the last fifty years. And while some have been absorbed by neighboring countries or interned in generational limbo within places like Jordan and Lebanon, the lion’s share didn’t stay in the Middle East at all. They followed the refugee pipelines—conveniently carved out by Western NGOs and international bureaucrats—all the way to the glittering cities of Europe and the sprawling metroplexes of North America.

And once they arrived, they didn’t stay invisible for long.

FROM REFUGEES TO RULERS: THE ARAB RENAISSANCE IN EUROPE

Take London. Its mayor, Sadiq Khan, is the son of Pakistani immigrants and a practicing Muslim. He rules over a city that once stood as the capital of the largest empire in human history and now drowns in halal chicken joints, Sharia patrols, and knife crime. In the United Kingdom, "Muhammad"—in various spellings—is consistently among the top baby names in cities like Birmingham, Manchester, and Bradford. In fact, it's been the #1 baby boy name nationally more than once, depending on the spelling aggregation.

Over in Rotterdam, the Netherlands’ second-largest city, the mayor is Ahmed Aboutaleb, a Moroccan-born Muslim. This is the same Rotterdam that once gave Europe the Erasmus exchange program and trade access to the North Sea. It now boasts neighborhoods where Dutch is a second language and Salafist mosques are the tallest buildings in sight.

In Belgium, cities like Antwerp and Molenbeek have become notorious as hotbeds of Islamic radicalism—and yet they’re also hubs of political clout. Muslim politicians sit on municipal councils, lead housing committees, and run voter outreach for major parties. Molenbeek’s leadership has repeatedly included Muslim mayors and deputy mayors. The city has become shorthand for Europe's failed assimilation experiment—but it’s also a case study in demographic conquest via ballot box.

Oslo, Norway, is no exception. The number of Muslims in the capital has ballooned to over 10% in just a few decades. The local Labour Party, desperate to harvest migrant votes, has filled its ranks with Arab and Somali candidates, many of whom proudly announce their support for Palestinian resistance and opposition to Norway's traditional foreign alliances.

In France, the transformation is even starker. Marseille, once a proud Mediterranean trading post of French identity, now has entire districts that operate like independent fiefdoms of North Africa. In cities like Paris, Toulouse, and Lyon, Arab Muslims hold seats in municipal government, control major voting blocs, and frequently appear on national talk shows as "community spokespeople."

Sweden—yes, Sweden—has had Arab Muslim mayors in cities like Malmö, where Middle Eastern gangs enforce de facto no-go zones and Jewish populations have quietly vanished. "Muhammad" and its variants are among the top baby names nationally. Political parties like the Social Democrats and even the Greens openly court the Muslim vote, platforming hijabi candidates and pushing for blasphemy laws under the guise of anti-Islamophobia.

Germany, though slower in its transformation, is catching up. Cities like Berlin, Frankfurt, and Cologne now host powerful Muslim political activists—many of whom immigrated as asylum seekers or children of guest workers. Berlin’s Neukölln district, long a Turkish stronghold, now elects council members with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood or Turkish nationalist groups. Entire schools operate in Arabic as a first language.

And don't forget Austria, Denmark, or Italy. These are not fringe examples. These are systemic trends across the Western world.

In nearly every Western European country, Muhammad is not just a household name—it is the household name. It dominates birth registries, voter rolls, and now political campaign signs. From municipal councils to national legislatures, from housing departments to justice ministries, the Arab Muslim footprint is not only visible—it’s dominant.

But the punchline here is not just that Europe is being Islamized. It’s that the infrastructure of this transformation—the NGOs, the asylum policies, the refugee quotas, the resettlement funds—was constructed, lobbied for, and often funded by networks with little interest in preserving Western Christendom. And in many cases, these networks were spearheaded by people and institutions of Jewish identity.

You want irony? Here it is, wrapped in a keffiyeh and delivered by Uber Eats: the very Jewish philanthropic networks that supposedly guard against antisemitism are facilitating the political empowerment of those whose cultural instincts run straight toward the Caliphate.

THE STRANGEST ALLIANCE: JEWISH NETWORKS AND MUSLIM MIGRATION

Now we arrive at the heart of the matter—an uncomfortable, rarely broached, and heavily patrolled zone of discourse: the role of Jewish philanthropic and advocacy groups in promoting Muslim and Arab migration into the West. The suggestion itself is treated like radioactive waste. Whisper it too loudly and the watchdogs come howling. The Anti-Defamation League will accuse you of trafficking in anti-Semitic tropes. The SPLC will put your name on a list. Media gatekeepers will do their job and make sure no one takes your claims seriously.

And yet, the evidence persists.

George Soros, the archangel of transnational liberalism, is perhaps the most glaring example. Through his Open Society Foundations, Soros has poured hundreds of millions into migration advocacy, border deconstruction, and refugee resettlement initiatives. During the Central American migrant caravan crisis of 2018, multiple Soros-funded organizations—including Pueblo Sin Fronteras, the Vera Institute of Justice, and the National Immigration Law Center—were involved in facilitating, transporting, or legally shielding the caravans moving north toward the U.S. border.

Even major news organizations acknowledged this to varying degrees. Soros himself, in a 2016 interview and again in op-eds, admitted to viewing national borders as obstacles to be overcome and migration as a moral necessity. While the fact-checking industry tried to throw cold water on claims that Soros “funded the caravans,” their debunkings often amounted to parsing semantics. Yes, his money flowed through multiple intermediary groups. But it still flowed.

This same playbook applies in Europe. Open Society Foundations bankrolls everything from migrant rights NGOs in Germany and Greece to media outlets in Spain and Italy that shape the narrative around asylum seekers. The goal is the same everywhere: undermine national identity, expand migration pipelines, and neuter any political resistance that smells like nationalism.

If you appreciate my work, consider a paid subscription to access exclusive content (like the rest of this article). But get this…through July 4, a generous supporter will pay half of the subscription for the next year. Subscribe now at 50% off .

If you don’t do subscriptions but would like to throw me some love anyway, consider a one-time gift of your choosing by clicking the ‘coffee link’ below. This is one of the things I do to provide for my small farm and big family, so I sure appreciate it.