Who are the “Christians” being used as attack dogs against fellow believers on behalf of Israel and its political interests? When I dug into who these people actually are, what they are actually tied to, and what their organizations actually do, the results were absolutely shocking. Or maybe not. Because once you peel back the pious branding and the sentimental words about “blessing Israel,” you find an entire network of Christian Zionist operatives functioning as mouthpieces, political weapons, and narrative enforcers for the enemies of Christ. And the man who Mark Levin used to attack Tucker turns out to be at the center of one of the most astonishing examples of foreign influence dressed up as ministry that I have ever seen.
I first came across the story the way millions did. I opened X and saw Mark Levin, the NeoCon oracle himself, posting a Jerusalem Post article quoting Mike Evans, founder of Friends of Zion, accusing Tucker Carlson of saying something “worse than the Nazi Party platform in 1921.”
It stopped me cold. That sort of statement is designed to detonate reputations. When I see someone deploy the word Nazi that casually, I instantly know they have either lost their mind or are trying to make someone else lose theirs. I have listened to Tucker Carlson for years, not casually but attentively. I have never once heard him say anything remotely antisemitic. I have also never heard him encourage hatred, bigotry, or violence toward anyone. He has spent more time publicly denouncing political extremism than most media hosts combined.
So my first reaction was simple disbelief. But my second reaction was curiosity. Levin is not stupid. He knows what he is doing. So why was a prominent Jewish NeoCon using the words of a supposed Christian minister to make a nuclear accusation against a fellow Christian? That is when the real question formed. Who is this Christian who allows himself to be turned into a political weapon for others? Who is this minister who takes his supposed spiritual authority and bends it into a tool for smearing Christian brothers in order to curry favor with the Israeli state or its media apparatus?
So I started digging. What I found was not a minister. Not a pastor. Not a prophet. Not even an evangelist. What I found was a political asset disguised as a Christian leader. What I found was a man who has constructed his identity around servicing the interests of a foreign nation and using theology as a disguise. And once I began examining the Friends of Zion empire he created, the hypocrisy behind his accusation became impossible to ignore.
That is why his line about “the pulpit must be stronger than the propaganda” struck me as pure projection. It was one of the most unintentionally revealing sentences I have ever read. He was not describing Tucker Carlson. He was describing himself. He was not condemning propaganda. He was confessing it. Because the Friends of Zion enterprise is built on propaganda. It is built on curated narratives, government favored storylines, state approved history, and a political theology that exists only to sanctify the interests of the Israeli government. Evans is steeped in propaganda all the way down to the bone. His museum is a propaganda platform. His media center in Jerusalem is a propaganda hub. His political relationships are propaganda channels. His awards are propaganda rituals disguised as honors. His public interventions in American media are propaganda attacks. He accused Tucker of what he does professionally.
THE PUBLIC FACE AND THE HIDDEN MACHINE
The truth behind Evans’s organization is the opposite of his self portrayal. It is not a ministry. It is a foreign influence platform operating under the cover of Christian Zionism. The Friends of Zion Museum sits not in a church but at the center of Jerusalem’s state tourism framework. It is officially promoted by the Ministry of Tourism, endorsed by the Ministry of Jerusalem and Heritage, and highlighted by the Jerusalem Development Authority. No foreign ministry anywhere on the planet is granted this level of state integration unless it serves a national purpose. And FOZ serves that purpose well. It offers Israel a professionally built narrative machine funded entirely by American donors.
That alone exposes the propaganda. A museum that tells only one side of a geopolitical story, subsidizes Israeli tourism, advances Israeli public diplomacy, and trains Israeli soldiers in state preferred history is not a ministry. It is an instrument. A ministry is accountable to God. A propaganda instrument is accountable to the state whose narrative it promotes. Evans built his museum to glorify Christian Zionists as saviors of Israel. The Israeli state embraced it because that narrative is politically useful. It reinforces the idea that Christian support is not just sentimental but historic, covenantal, and morally mandated. It creates a felt obligation in Christians to defend Israel even when Israel acts unjustly. And it wraps all of this in a religious vocabulary that discourages dissent.
This is propaganda. It is carefully engineered messaging designed to shape public opinion. Tucker Carlson does not engage in anything remotely similar. His show invites debate, questions assumptions, and challenges power structures. Evans, on the other hand, builds power structures, reinforces power structures, and defends power structures. If one wants to locate actual propaganda, all one has to do is follow where the Israeli government invests its time and endorsements. It invests in FOZ.
THE PUBLIC DIPLOMACY APPARATUS
The Friends of Zion Museum is not an isolated project. It is one node in a larger institutional ecosystem. Evans built a sophisticated media center in Jerusalem that Israel Hayom described as “dedicated to helping Israel’s public diplomacy efforts.” The Israeli government uses FOZ facilities for press events, diplomatic ceremonies, and the Christian Media Summit, which is organized by the Government Press Office and the Ministry of Jerusalem and Heritage. Prime ministers and presidents have stood on Evans’s stage to deliver speeches aimed at Christian audiences worldwide. They chose FOZ rather than government buildings or official cultural centers. They chose FOZ because it gives them a safe environment with a guaranteed friendly audience. FOZ offers the optics of Christian solidarity without the inconvenient presence of dissenting voices.
When Evans accuses others of propaganda, he is attacking those who question the very narratives he exists to protect. He is attacking those who refuse to treat foreign governments as sacred. Tucker Carlson’s criticism of American foreign policy has always been rooted in a simple idea. Nations must prioritize their own interests rather than serve as perpetual war machines for others. Evans calls that position antisemitic because his entire enterprise depends on blurring the line between critique of policy and hatred of people. That is why he resorts to grotesque historical comparisons. It is not because he believes them. It is because he needs them. Propaganda requires moral shock. It requires emotional punctuation. It requires labels so extreme they end debate. Evans uses those labels to protect the interests of the Israeli state.
THE LOBBY THAT PRETENDS IT IS A MINISTRY
Friends of Zion operates as a lobbying institution while pretending to be a devotional ministry. That is why Evans courts world leaders and hands out awards not to missionaries or scholars but to presidents, prime ministers, monarchs, and political influencers. The Friends of Zion Award is a lobbying instrument. It is a way to bolster the public image of leaders who support Israeli policy.
This is propaganda. Real ministries do not curate political pantheons. Real ministries do not praise politicians for military actions. Real ministries do not award foreign heads of state for their usefulness to geopolitical strategy. FOZ does. And the Israeli government pays attention. Whenever a global leader receives the FOZ award, Israeli politicians amplify the moment to demonstrate international support. The award is photographed, televised, and circulated across Israel’s media networks. It is political theater produced by FOZ and broadcast by the state. Tucker Carlson has never participated in anything comparable. He does not give out awards. He does not sanctify political leaders. He does not operate diplomatic channels. Evans does
THE FINANCIAL PIPELINE THAT PROVES THE POINT
Nothing exposes propaganda like money. When you look closely at FOZ’s financial ecosystem, the reality becomes unavoidable. Evans raises millions of dollars from American Christians and pours those funds into Israeli institutions, Israeli contractors, Israeli municipal programs, Israeli social projects, and Israeli tourism infrastructure. The money leaves the hands of American donors and reappears as Israeli assets. The FOZ Museum was built by Israeli firms, staffed by Israeli workers, and remains a permanent fixture of Israel’s cultural environment. The museum generates tourism revenue. The media center generates public diplomacy advantages. The humanitarian projects FOZ sponsors relieve the Israeli state of expenses it would otherwise incur.
This is state benefiting propaganda. It is not criminal. It is not illegal. But it is not spiritual ministry. Evans sells Christianity and delivers political influence. He sells biblical duty and delivers economic subsidy. He sells solidarity and delivers narrative shaping. And after doing all of this, he has the audacity to call Tucker Carlson worse than Nazis. The projection would be laughable if it were not so deceitful.
THE ACCUSATION THAT REVEALS EVERYTHING
When Evans condemned Tucker Carlson, he revealed the basic psychological trick behind all propaganda. Accuse your critics of the very thing you are doing. Evans lives in a world built on politicized narrative. Tucker Carlson lives in a world built on questions. Evans cannot survive questions, so he labels them dangerous. Tucker invites questions, so Evans labels him a Nazi.
This is why his statement struck me. It was not merely outrageous. It was a confession. It was the accidental unveiling of the entire machine behind him. And once you see that machine, you cannot unsee it.
HERE’S WHAT I FOUND
The FOZ Museum in Jerusalem is not an independent Christian attraction sitting quietly on a street corner. As I mentioned above, it is embedded inside the country’s official tourism system, promoted as part of the portfolio of the Ministry of Tourism, elevated by the Ministry of Jerusalem and Heritage, and endorsed by the Jerusalem Development Authority. An institution appears on those channels only when the state believes it serves a national purpose. In the case of Friends of Zion, that purpose is unmistakable. It gives Israel a safe, American funded platform for shaping the political consciousness of Christian visitors and a stage upon which the state can tell its preferred historical story with no risk of contradiction.
The museum’s emergence as a civic landmark was not organic. It was coordinated. When Israel designates a site as part of its state tourism framework, it is declaring that site a vessel of national narrative. It presents a storyline in which Christian Zionists are woven into the founding and survival of modern Israel, reinforcing the idea that Christians are covenant partners whose moral obligation is loyalty to the state. This is not academic history. This is narrative politics, and the state of Israel recognizes FOZ as a useful instrument in that domain.
The relationship does not stop at tourism and cultural promotion. The Israeli military itself utilizes the Friends of Zion Museum through the Education Corps of the IDF. Soldiers are brought into FOZ as part of their educational programming, where they are shown a curated story of Christian solidarity that reinforces the idea of an international alliance rooted in faith. No foreign ministry on earth receives this kind of access to the military education system of another country unless the host country sees it as strategically valuable. FOZ has been welcomed into that role because it reinforces a worldview the Israeli military leadership wants soldiers to internalize. That worldview says that global Christianity, especially the American evangelical sector, is an unshakable ally whose political pressure can be counted on when Israel faces criticism or conflict. The museum is a classroom for that doctrine. The fact that the IDF itself participates in FOZ programming is one of the clearest proofs that the ministry is not merely adjacent to Israeli state power. It is part of its extended nervous system.
FRIENDS OF ZION AND THE ISRAELI LOBBY
Friends of Zion is more than a cultural outpost or museum. It is a weight bearing pillar of the political architecture that binds American evangelical support to Israeli lobbying objectives. The founder, Mike Evans, has spent decades cultivating relationships with American political operators, presidents, and members of Congress. He has also spent decades cultivating an even closer relationship with Benjamin Netanyahu, a relationship that Israeli journalists have documented since the 1980s. Netanyahu’s repeated appearances at FOZ events are not sentimental gestures. They are the visible performance of a political alliance in which FOZ delivers what no formal lobby can deliver. It delivers millions of deeply loyal evangelical voters who accept Israel’s political interests as Christian moral duties.
FOZ promotes itself as a ministry, but it functions as an evangelical data mine, a political amplifier, and a credibility factory. When FOZ gives its Friends of Zion Award, the recipients are overwhelmingly political leaders, not ministers or theologians. These awards are distributed to sitting presidents, prime ministers, monarchs, and foreign policy actors whose decisions directly affect Israel’s strategic environment. The award functions as a seal of evangelical legitimacy, a public blessing that signals to millions of American Christians that this person is a defender of God’s chosen people. The political value of that endorsement is enormous. A sitting American president publicly recognized by FOZ becomes instantly canonized in the evangelical imagination as a champion of Israel, and that status can move votes in battleground states. FOZ knows this. Israeli political elites know this. The award is not a devotional token. It is a lobbying tool dressed up as a religious honor.
Israel’s lobbying ecosystem in the United States has traditionally required coordination between formal lobbies, political action committees, think tanks, and advocacy groups. FOZ adds something far more potent. It adds theology. AIPAC can mobilize donors, but FOZ can mobilize pastors who will spend consecutive Sundays preaching in favor of Israeli policy. Traditional lobbies operate through political persuasion. FOZ operates through eschatology. It frames political outcomes as divine mandates, which is a far more powerful form of influence.
The relationship between FOZ and the Israeli lobbying enterprise does not flow in only one direction. Israeli political leadership uses FOZ as a megaphone whenever tensions rise. When public relations crises emerge, FOZ becomes a rapid response channel for framing events in ways that will resonate with Christian audiences. When Israel finds itself under scrutiny for military actions, FOZ produces museum content, video packages, and global appeals that frame Israel as the righteous underdog and frame criticisms as threats to biblical mandate. In many cases, this messaging is coordinated with Israeli ministries and officials, which makes FOZ a de facto communications contractor for the state. It is not registered as a foreign agent because its structure does not require such registration. It is funded by Americans, housed in Israel, embraced by the state, and deployed as needed without leaving the fingerprints that formal lobbying leaves. It is lobbying without paperwork, and that is precisely what makes it so valuable.
Friends of Zion also provides the Israeli lobby with a psychological safety valve. Israeli officials know that American attitudes toward Israel are shifting. Younger demographics are less sympathetic, more skeptical, and less willing to unquestioningly support foreign wars. FOZ is the apparatus that bypasses these demographic changes by speaking directly to a subset of Americans who do not make policy but influence those who do. It aims at older, churchgoing evangelicals who vote in primaries, who show up on election day, and who pressure their representatives on foreign policy. FOZ does not need to convince the entire country. It only needs to maintain its grip on the demographic bloc that consistently swings elections, especially in states where evangelical turnout determines outcomes. In that sense, FOZ acts as one of the most efficient lobbying structures in the entire pro Israel ecosystem.
Oh, by the way…as hard as I looked, I couldn’t find a single example of FOZ or Mike Evans preaching Jesus Christ or His gospel to Israelis. Nothing. Not a hint of gospel witness whatsoever. Can you imagine that? All of those millions from evangelicals in America thinking they’re doing something loving, and the most loving thing of all - sharing the Good News - is completely absent from their work. Strange, right?
FRIENDS OF ZION AND THE FINANCIAL PIPELINE
The financial relationship between Friends of Zion and the Israeli state is complex, but it is not opaque. It is not a matter of the Israeli Treasury cutting checks to an American nonprofit. It is a matter of American donors funding Israeli institutions, Israeli contractors, Israeli municipalities, Israeli social programs, Israeli cultural infrastructure, and Israeli public diplomacy operations through an intermediary organization that is ideologically aligned with the state. Israeli funding does not flow into FOZ. FOZ funding flows into Israel. That is the arrangement, and it benefits the state immensely.
The museum is not an American cultural outpost. It is an Israeli economic project financed by American religious sentiment. It exists on Israeli soil, is owned by an Israeli entity, and adds to Israel’s tourism revenue. The Friends of Zion donors paid for it. The Israeli state benefits from it.
The financial pipeline predates the museum. Before FOZ existed as a brand, Mike Evans operated the Jerusalem Prayer Team, an organization that raised money for municipal projects in Jerusalem, including direct fundraising for the New Jerusalem Foundation under the leadership of then mayor Ehud Olmert. Reuters reported that the Jerusalem Prayer Team raised more than two hundred and thirty thousand dollars for Olmert’s foundation, which used the funds for parks, charity centers, and civic improvements. That money was raised in American churches, deposited in American accounts, and transferred into an Israeli municipal body. The relationship was not charitable in a vague sense. It was a documented financial transfer from an American Christian organization into the operating budget of a municipal authority in Israel’s capital.
This model repeats itself across multiple FOZ projects. American Christians donate under the impression that they are helping “God’s people.” The money then bypasses American charitable needs entirely and lands in Israeli social programs that the Israeli government would otherwise need to fund itself.
There is also an unspoken financial dynamic at work. Any foreign ministry or public diplomacy office must normally fund its own global influence operations. It must build relationships, create distribution channels, maintain facilities, pay staff, contract designers, and cultivate audiences. FOZ takes on almost all of those costs. It provides the network. It provides the distribution list. It provides the audience. It provides the theological hook that keeps Christian listeners loyal. FOZ absorbs the expenses and Israel collects the returns. This is not a charitable gift. It is a subsidy. And it is one of the most valuable subsidies that Israel receives from any foreign constituency.
THE UNDENIABLE PATTERN
The pattern is unmistakable. Friends of Zion is woven into the institutional fabric of the Israeli state, deployed as part of its lobbying strategy, and used as an American funded financial channel for Israeli cultural, municipal, and political projects. The ministry’s rhetoric appeals to Christian conscience. Its operations appeal to Israeli national interest. FOZ is not an independent devotional institution offering spiritual enrichment. It is a foreign policy instrument disguised as a ministry, and its effectiveness depends entirely on its ability to cloak political influence in religious language. The organization exists at the precise intersection where American evangelical devotion becomes a resource that can be harvested for a foreign nation.
Friends of Zion tells its donors that their contributions bless God’s chosen people. What it does not tell them is that those donations also finance Israeli municipal budgets, Israeli social programs, Israeli military educational initiatives, Israeli media operations, Israeli diplomatic functions, and Israeli tourism infrastructure. The donors believe they are supporting a spiritual mission. In reality, they are underwriting the soft power of a foreign government.
No other foreign nation has a Christian ministry in the United States that delivers this level of strategic benefit. Friends of Zion is not simply an ally to Israel. It is a quiet extension of Israeli statecraft, a hybrid entity that functions as both a ministry and a foreign influence platform. Its ties to the Israeli state are undeniable. Its role in Israeli lobbying is documented. Its financial pipeline flows into Israel with remarkable consistency. And its ability to cloak all of this in spiritual language makes it one of the most effective foreign influence machines operating on American soil.
If Friends of Zion were merely a museum, none of this would matter. But it is not a museum. It is a mechanism. And given its reach, its influence, and its deep integration into the Israeli state, it deserves a level of scrutiny it has never been forced to endure.
THE BLASPHEMY OF USING CHRIST TO ATTACK CHRISTIANS
There is something far darker and far more sickening in all of this than mere political hypocrisy. It is the fact that an organization which cloaks itself in the name of Christ has weaponized that name in order to wage a dishonest, vicious, and coordinated assault on a Christian man whose only crime is refusing to bend his knee to a foreign government. It is moral inversion on a level that should make any sober Christian recoil. It is the very definition of spiritual abuse. What Mike Evans did was not a doctrinal disagreement. It was not a correction. It was not discernment. It was an act of slander designed to destroy the reputation of a Christian brother at the request of the political machine he serves. When a man labels a fellow Christian “worse than Nazis” in order to protect the image of a foreign state, he is not engaged in ministry. He is engaged in blasphemy.
The sickness of this moment lies in the fact that Tucker Carlson has never done anything to warrant such condemnation. He has never preached hatred of the Jewish people. He has never endorsed bigotry. He has never promoted violence. His entire public record demonstrates the exact opposite. He has repeatedly warned against racial hatred, tribal hostility, and political extremism. The only thing he has challenged is the idea that America must endlessly subsidize the military actions, political choices, and foreign policy objectives of Israel. For Mike Evans, that alone is enough to brand a man a Nazi. That tells you everything about the moral compass of Friends of Zion. It is not oriented toward Scripture. It is oriented toward state power.
This is what makes the attack not only dishonest but evil. When a ministry uses Christ’s name to enforce loyalty to a foreign government, it is no longer a ministry. It is an idol factory. It replaces the God of the Bible with a political kingdom and demands obedience to that kingdom in the name of faith. This is the same ancient temptation that corrupted Israel throughout the Old Testament. It is the same deception that drove God’s people to worship Baal on the high places while telling themselves they were still honoring Yahweh. It is the same spirit that takes something earthly and elevates it to something divine. Friends of Zion has taken a modern state, with all its sins, its scandals, its injustices, and its political agendas, and placed it on the altar. Then it turns and demands that Christians sacrifice truth and integrity upon that altar, even if it means slandering a faithful brother.
There is a cruelty in this behavior that reveals its spiritual nature. The state does not care about truth. The state cares about control. And Evans has become one of its instruments. His attack on Tucker Carlson was not the spontaneous outrage of a Christian offended by sin. It was the reflexive strike of a loyal servant protecting the prestige of his patron. It was an extension of the Israeli public diplomacy machine that FOZ has fully integrated itself into. But the horror is that Evans performed this political service while invoking the authority of the pulpit. He used the language of faith as a weapon against a man who has shown far more moral clarity, humility, and concern for truth than the entire FOZ apparatus.
What makes this so perverse is the asymmetry of character. Tucker Carlson has no museum in Jerusalem. He has no government backed media center. He has no diplomatic award program. He has no army of donors funding foreign propaganda. He has no relationship with prime ministers who expect him to protect their political interests. He has only a microphone and a conscience. And yet this man, armed with little more than honesty and questions, was smeared as worse than Nazis by a ministry propped up by an entire state apparatus. The magnitude of the lie is almost surreal.
This is what spiritual corruption looks like when it matures. It takes the sacred things of God and enlists them in the service of earthly powers. It uses Scripture as a bludgeon to silence dissent. It trades the humility of the Gospel for the arrogance of political privilege. And it never repents because it believes its loyalty to the state is a form of righteousness. When a man believes serving a foreign nation is equivalent to serving God, he will eventually justify any attack, any lie, any smear, and any betrayal of Christian brothers. Tucker Carlson simply became the latest target.
The attack on Tucker was not just wrong. It was wicked. It revealed that Friends of Zion does not function as a ministry of Christ but as an embassy of political propaganda wearing a religious mask. It showed that its leadership is willing to crucify fellow believers on the altar of geopolitical loyalty and call the sacrifice holy. For a ministry to engage in this level of dishonesty is not merely a problem. It is a sign of judgment. Because when Christ’s name is misused to protect power rather than proclaim truth, the lampstand begins to flicker. And no amount of political access, museum glamour, or state endorsement can hide that spiritual rot forever.
NOW, REMEMBER THIS…
I found this information on accident and by happenstance, because I showed a moment of curiosity to research whomever Mark Levin was citing. Had it not been such a preposterous line, claiming Tucker’s rhetoric was worse than Nazis, I never would have looked. But here’s the truth…behind almost every such attack in the news from supposed “Christians” attacking America First patriots, you’ll find the bread crumbs going back to the same source. And that source is the State of Israel.
There are thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of similar articles, quotes, and headlines every day, waging rhetorical war against American Christians. And I’m here to tell you that St. Paul wrote under divine inspiration when he said that despite Jews being loved because God had chose them to reveal his oracles in ages past, they nonetheless “according to the gospel, are enemies” (Romans 11:28).
If you appreciate my free article, you’ll love the paid content. Subscribe now at a 20% discount to access exclusive stuff.
